bitterfruit
02-14-2003, 12:51 PM
The same people who bring us Rolling Stone Magazine, MCA Records, Universal Music, and MP3.com also sell independent music from independent labels at fire sale prices. That's right, Vivendi music owns emusic.com.
Emusic.com has a pretty interesting history. I spent some time to do a little research into their beginnings as a company and their current intent. Why would anyone want to sell music at such cut-rate prices? It's easy to understand why someone would buy it so cheap. They don't really need to make money on emusic.com is the thing. They are owned by a company worth 16.6 billion dollars. No typo: it's billion.
Does anyone else sense a little conflict of interest when a major label outfit wants to sell competitive independent music but at a drastically reduced price?
Funny enough, they were part of the dot com bubble at one point with a ticker symbol on the NASDAQ. It's laughable actually to look at their financial history considering the climate at the time.
Emusic.com has a pretty interesting history. I spent some time to do a little research into their beginnings as a company and their current intent. Why would anyone want to sell music at such cut-rate prices? It's easy to understand why someone would buy it so cheap. They don't really need to make money on emusic.com is the thing. They are owned by a company worth 16.6 billion dollars. No typo: it's billion.
Does anyone else sense a little conflict of interest when a major label outfit wants to sell competitive independent music but at a drastically reduced price?
Funny enough, they were part of the dot com bubble at one point with a ticker symbol on the NASDAQ. It's laughable actually to look at their financial history considering the climate at the time.